
Solutions · Employers & Check-off Lending
Ustawi for check-off (payroll-deduction) lending.
- Batch · Sep
- TSh 62.0M · 98% reconciled
- Deduction batches
- Generated from live schedules
- Under-remittance
- Flagged per employee
Why Ustawi fits a check-off lender
- Employer MOU management — a status and terms record per employer
- Deduction batches generated from active loan schedules
- Per-employee reconciliation that flags under-remittance as an exception
- Credit-life cover on check-off loans, like any other loan
- Deductions and remittances posted through to the GL
Where every deduction line starts
Check-off lending runs on two relationships: the employer's payroll office and the lender behind the MOU.


One deduction cycle, end to end
September's cycle across 24 employers: from each MOU to a batch, a remittance, a per-employee match and the GL.
Tap a stage to stop on it. Hover pauses the animation.
Check the deduction headroom yourself
Move salary, existing deductions and the employer's limit, and see whether a TSh 91,000 check-off instalment still fits.
Ceiling = net salary × limit; headroom = ceiling − existing deductions. Deduction limits are set per employer MOU.
Modules this solution enables
Employer MOU management, payroll-deduction batches, and reconciliation.
Applications, the branch→committee→board approval ladder, disbursement, repayment scheduling, restructuring, and write-offs.
Policy issuance, premium posting, and claims lodge/assess/settle.
Double-entry GL, chart of accounts, trial balance, period close, and VAT treatment mapping.
Managing many employer relationships at scale
- Onboard the employer with an MOU — a status-and-terms record that governs every deduction under it.
- Generate that employer's deduction batch automatically from the live loan schedules for the cycle.
- Reconcile the remittance that actually arrives against what was expected, per employee, and flag any shortfall as an exception before it becomes a collections problem.
From a remittance spreadsheet to one reconciliation
Drag the slider: the same September cycle, tracked in a workbook versus reconciled in Ustawi.
| Tanzanite Foods | 28.4M | 28.4M | ok |
| Dar Logistics | 12.6M | 12.6M? | posted? |
| Kilimo Bora | 6.1M | #REF! | ask payroll |
| 21 others | — | ?? | lump sum |

Related solutions
Because you need BOT-aligned reporting and a full loan lifecycle out of the box.
Because member savings, group governance, and regulatory reporting live in one system.
Because GL, provisioning, and prudential reporting need bank-grade rigor.
See employer-relationship lending run at scale.
Book a tailored walk-through and we'll show you the workflow end to end.
Frequently asked questions
Directly from active loan schedules under each employer's active MOU — see Check-off Salary Lending.